Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
Yes, I agree wholeheartedly with Dr. Singer. I’ve experienced what the article describes but with a weird twist. Over ten years ago my job entailed dealing with total strangers, about four to five thousand a year. It was inevitable that I met people with massive social problems and after five years of working non-stop my doctor told me that I needed a change. Basically I had fallen into the trap of empathizing with the clients. All this, as Dr. Singer suggests, happened at a subconscious level and it was making me sick, little by little and over time. In fact, after I managed to convince my boss to switch me to a different department I immediately began to feel better.
Over the last six years I’ve been again dealing with lots of different people although it’s to do with our internal Human Resources department. Meeting many colleagues, I’m getting the same bad vibes from people with personal problems (many are friends) but this time I’m not suffering as before. It must be the process that the article describes; I’ve switched from empathy to compassion and it’s not making me ill. It must be because I can relate to colleagues better (all in the same boat) and perhaps because I can suggest possible solutions from an HR perspective. Also, there’s a twist, in many cases I know for fact that the moaning and groaning of many colleagues is all an “Act” to gain some kind of advantage, information, etc. etc., and I’ve learned to identify the time wasters much faster than before. In these cases the emotion in neither empathy nor compassion but disgust and ultimately, total disregard.
I had not noticed this inversion in my outlook so I can only put it down to another subconscious mechanism. Since reading the article I’ve been thinking about the other interactions I have that make me teeter emotionally, in particular, with regards to animals. I love animals and can’t stand to see them suffer. I’ve realized that with animals I have a completely different reaction; I find that I feel both empathic and compassionate at the same time. I hate this trait of mine but I automatically stare into the eyes of animals I encounter and I can instantly empathize with the creature. Can it be that an animal can communicate so much through their eyes; perhaps the literal “loss for words” gives them this only channel of communication (apart from body language). If this is so then I believe it is a much more sincere and precise way of communicating with us. Humans seem to have lost this form of interaction; perhaps we need to practice more [in front of a mirror] eye expressions and maybe, one day, we’ll all be able to communicate better without having to say a word.
Sorry for going off on a tangent, having a weird day. Great article nonetheless and food for thought. 🙂