‘Dreams without deadlines destroy people’ : this is certainly a truth written with ‘no secondary routes’ in mind.
We all can look at the experience of the 2nd World war. Time ago I finished reading a book who widely described the political and social ethos of the Great Britain of those years.
It is really interesting noting how the population couldn’t (and wouldn’t) be inclined to surrender even after the hard bombing in Coventry. Or the explosions in the London suburbs. And the thousands death.
That people teach us that bombs can’t really destroy men: while phisically, only the pursue of the greater good of the nation and of the civilization, made men, and the GB, undefeatable.
They bore their mission, and dreams, clear in mind.
It’s so strange the human being: one can be really destroyed only if his virtues and inner resources are tucked away, whilst no real, physical assassination, can bring damage to his psyche.
I really believe what the author imply: the most hidden and everlasting damage is done to the good ideas and the hope of those who lives by, not to the person, if the first two are lost forever. Thus, the society lives in serenity or suffers accordingly…
(I beg your pardon if I may seem too much metaphysical this time!)
‘Dreams without deadlines destroy people’ : this is certainly a truth written with ‘no secondary routes’ in mind.
We all can look at the experience of the 2nd World war. Time ago I finished reading a book who widely described the political and social ethos of the Great Britain of those years.
It is really interesting noting how the population couldn’t (and wouldn’t) be inclined to surrender even after the hard bombing in Coventry. Or the explosions in the London suburbs. And the thousands death.
That people teach us that bombs can’t really destroy men: while phisically, only the pursue of the greater good of the nation and of the civilization, made men, and the GB, undefeatable.
They bore their mission, and dreams, clear in mind.
It’s so strange the human being: one can be really destroyed only if his virtues and inner resources are tucked away, whilst no real, physical assassination, can bring damage to his psyche.
I really believe what the author imply: the most hidden and everlasting damage is done to the good ideas and the hope of those who lives by, not to the person, if the first two are lost forever. Thus, the society lives in serenity or suffers accordingly…
(I beg your pardon if I may seem too much metaphysical this time!)